Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alina Charaeva vs Magali Kempen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Charaeva vs Kempen analysis and find out who is favored!
Alina Charaeva vs Magali Kempen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Charaeva 1 - 0 Kempen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Charaeva has won 45.89% of points on their second serve, while Kempen has won 46.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Charaeva, in recent form, has won 61.19% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kempen has won 54.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.84% and 40.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Charaeva has saved 58.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kempen has saved 48.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Charaeva has won 68.85% of matches played (W/L 42/ 19), with Kempen winning 51.28% (W/L 20/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Charaeva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 44/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 22/ 13). Kempen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 51/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Charaeva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.85% of matches (W/L 42/ 19), where as Kempen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 20/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Charaeva winning 1 times and Kempen being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Charaeva winning 2 and Kempen winning 1. The last match between Charaeva and Kempen was at the W25 Monastir, 18-12-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Alina Charaeva getting the victory 5-7 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Charaeva and Kempen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Charaeva winning 1 times and Kempen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Charaeva winning 0, and Kempen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Charaeva has played against opponents with an average rank of 294.97 while Kempen has played against players with an average rank of 288.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Charaeva has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kempen has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Charaeva has converted 48.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kempen has converted 42.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
300
Rank
300
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
461
Rank
191
High
26
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
66% (119-60)
Career Total W/L
63% (257-149)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
75% (15-5)
$5,000
Career Prize Money
$2,000
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Alina Charaeva | Magali Kempen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:0:0 | 3:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (83/135) | 68% (64/94) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (48/83) | 55% (35/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (24/52) | 40% (12/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 40% (6/15) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (47/94) | 47% (63/135) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Alina Charaeva
Player
Magali Kempen
61%
(
83 of
135)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
63 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alina Charaeva | Magali Kempen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 75% (15/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (15/12) | 69% (33/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (139/114) | 58% (252/182) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 78% (14/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 47 | 91 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 89 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:38 | 1:30:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 433.18 | 292.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (497/872) | 67% (841/1257) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (325/497) | 70% (587/841) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (165/375) | 47% (196/416) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (58/120) | 44% (82/185) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (408/843) | 45% (637/1420) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (7/4) | 75% (15/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 75% (15/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 100% (4/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 40% (5/2) |
Alina Charaeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Alina Charaeva
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
55%
(
66 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
11
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
54 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Alina Charaeva
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Polina Iatcenko
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Alina Charaeva
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Alina Charaeva
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
103)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Lena Couto
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Julia Avdeeva
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Magali Kempen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Magali Kempen
37%
(
22 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Magali Kempen
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Georgia Pedone
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Pemra Ozgen
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aravane Rezai
Player
Magali Kempen
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
2
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Pemra Ozgen
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oceane Dodin
Player
Magali Kempen
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
13
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
0-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Ella Seidel
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Charaeva Vs Kempen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
